Legal versus lawful

Legal versus lawful

Lawful Authority, System Recognition, Enforceability, and Perceived Legitimacy

PACKET 2 OF 7

The Instigator Who Becomes the Accuser

Rebellion before Human Participation • The Double Standard • Scripture Witness

Bible SuperChat Study Packet

Packet 2 Contents

Packet 1 established the measuring line: God is the rightful Source; dominion is delegated; operative power does not create lawful title. Packet 2 now examines the rebel who precedes the accusation and the double standard within the fallen order.

Packet 2 Opening — Before the Accusation, There Is an Instigator

3. Rebellion before Human Participation

3.1 The Satan as creature, not source

3.2 The liar from the beginning

3.3 The murderer from the beginning

3.4 Pre-emptive destructive desire

3.5 Theft, destruction, and usurpation

3.6 No lawful path from rebellion to rightful kingship

4. The Double Standard

4.1 The instigator becomes the accuser

4.2 Desire is stirred and then prosecuted

4.3 Anger condemned by a murderer

4.4 Guilt below and apparent exemption above

4.5 Present asymmetry is not final exemption

4.6 Fallen principalities and the enforcement question

4.7 Accusation unto death

Packet 2 Closing — The Accuser Is Not the Lawgiver

Packet 2 — The Instigator Who Becomes the Accuser

Rebellion before human participation, the accuser’s double standard, and the certainty of divine judgment

Packet 2 Opening — Before the Accusation, There Is an Instigator#

Accusation can make the accuser appear clean. The person standing over another person’s failure may seem detached from the disorder, as though he arrived only after the wrong was committed and now speaks for the rule that was broken.

That appearance is central to the counterfeit. The accuser’s strength grows when the accused sees only personal failure and no longer remembers who misrepresented the command, enticed the desire, encouraged the seizure, and sought the death that followed.

Scripture does not remove the image bearer’s responsibility. Adam and Eve act. Cain acts. Each person is drawn away by personal desire. Sin is not excused because a tempter was present. Yet neither does Scripture permit the tempter to stand as a neutral minister of justice.

The same canonical witness identifies the old serpent as the Devil and Satan, calls him the deceiver of the whole world, names him a liar and a murderer from the beginning, and later calls him the accuser of the brethren. Those roles must be read together.

This packet therefore begins before the accusation. It begins with the rebel who was not the Source, did not remain in truth, and had no lawful path from created service into rightful kingship. It then follows the movement by which the deceiver becomes the accuser and the murderer presses the sentence of death against those entangled in the rebellion.

The double standard does not mean that human guilt is imaginary. It means the accuser uses standards as weapons while refusing those standards as a measure over himself. He demands obedience from those beneath him while his own order begins in disobedience. He presses judgment downward while behaving as though judgment cannot reach upward.

The study will also correct that appearance. Scripture does not teach that Satan possesses a true exemption. It presents him as judged, limited, aware of an appointed time, and destined for final punishment. What appears as exemption is delayed and differently administered judgment, not lawful immunity.

➜ The rebel precedes the temptation → the tempter precedes the sin → the deceiver becomes the accuser

3. Rebellion before Human Participation#

3.1 The Satan as creature, not source#

The study must begin by refusing a false picture of two equal sources. God and Satan are not opposite creators competing from independent realms. Scripture begins with God as Creator. Everything visible and invisible belongs to the created order.

Paul gathers the unseen ranks into the creative work of the Eternal Son:

“For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him.”

— Colossians 1:16 (KJV)

Thrones, dominions, principalities, and powers do not originate themselves. Whatever their later rebellion, corruption, or hostile use, their existence is derivative. They are created by Him and for Him.

This establishes the first legal boundary. A creature may leave an assigned place. A creature may corrupt a gift, recruit followers, seize influence, or exercise terrible power. None of those actions makes the creature the Source of the order being misused.

Scripture also speaks directly of angelic rebellion:

“For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment.”

— 2 Peter 2:4 (KJV)

“And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.”

— Jude 6 (KJV)

These passages do not supply every detail of the fall of Satan or every fallen power. They do establish a governing pattern: angelic beings had an assigned estate; some sinned, kept it not, and left their proper habitation. Departure is not appointment. Abandoning an entrusted order cannot create lawful promotion above the One who created it.

By the time the serpent appears in Genesis 3, rebellion and deception are already active. The human fall does not create the first rebel desire. It provides the field into which an existing rebellion speaks.

3.2 The liar from the beginning#

The first words of the serpent do not announce open war. They open a question about the word and character of God.

“Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?”

— Genesis 3:1 (KJV)

The question bends the abundance. God had said, “Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat,” and then named one boundary. The serpent speaks as though the boundary summarizes the whole gift.

The deception then becomes direct:

“And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.”

— Genesis 3:4–5 (KJV)

The lie works through several movements at once:

• The warning is denied: “Ye shall not surely die.”

• The Giver is recast as withholding: God is represented as protecting His own position rather than the image bearer’s life.

• Seizure is presented as advancement: taking what has not been given is represented as the path to opened eyes and higher identity.

• Dependence is made to look immature: receiving good and evil from God is displaced by judging and taking for oneself.

Jesus later identifies the character behind this scene:

“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”

— John 8:44 (KJV)

The wording does not describe Satan as a second source of truth. He abode not in the truth. His lie is parasitic upon what God has spoken. He must bend the command, misrepresent the Giver, deny the consequence, and offer a counterfeit interpretation of life.

Revelation identifies the continuity of the figure:

“And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world.”

— Revelation 12:9 (KJV)

The serpent of Genesis, the Devil, Satan, the dragon, and the deceiver are gathered into one canonical identity. The false administration examined later does not begin with neutral government. It begins with a lie about God.

3.3 The murderer from the beginning#

Jesus joins the lie and the murder in one description. The devil is not only incorrect. His falsehood is directed toward death. The lie about God prepares the image bearer to step away from the Source of life.

The first human murder makes this inward movement visible. Cain’s offering is not respected, Cain becomes angry, and God addresses him before the murder:

“And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell. And the LORD said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen? If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.”

— Genesis 4:5–7 (KJV)

The warning preserves responsibility and possibility. Cain is not told that murder is inevitable. He is addressed, questioned, warned, and called to rule over the sin crouching at the door.

Cain does not heed the warning:

“And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.”

— Genesis 4:8 (KJV)

John later places Cain’s act inside the wicked-one pattern:

“Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.”

— 1 John 3:12 (KJV)

“Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.”

— 1 John 3:15 (KJV)

The movement is not limited to the outward act. Hatred, anger, envy, false interpretation, and refusal of correction form a field in which murder grows.

The Satanic desire to destroy therefore precedes the position of accuser. The one pressing death against others is identified by Jesus as a murderer from the beginning. That does not erase the murderer’s human servant. Cain acts and is accountable. It does expose the character of the rebellion into which Cain participates.

3.4 Pre-emptive destructive desire#

The word pre-emptive is important to the study’s sequence. The Satan does not become destructive only after humanity sins. Jesus describes the devil’s own lusts, lie, and murderous character as already belonging to him. His desire precedes the human act he later accuses.

At the same time, Scripture refuses to make the human participant an empty instrument. James places the point of conception inside personal desire:

“But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.”

— James 1:14–15 (KJV)

The tempter presents, distorts, entices, and takes advantage. The image bearer sees, desires, consents, and takes. Genesis makes this visible:

“And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat.”

— Genesis 3:6 (KJV)

The lie has now moved through perception into desire and through desire into action. John later names the recurring worldly field:

“For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.”

— 1 John 2:16 (KJV)

The correspondence should not be forced into a mechanical one-to-one formula, but the movement is clear: appetite, sight, and desired elevation can be detached from the Father and used as an entrance into self-directed seizure.

This gives the study a balanced sequence:

• Satanic desire: the rebel already lusts, lies, murders, and seeks worship.

• Satanic enticement: the command and the Giver are misrepresented.

• Human desire: the image bearer is drawn by personal lust and sees the prohibited object as desirable.

• Human action: desire conceives, sin is enacted, and death follows.

• Satanic accusation: the rebel presses the guilt and death he helped cultivate.

➜ Misrepresentation → sight → desire → seizure → sin → death

3.5 Theft, destruction, and usurpation#

Packet 1 established that Adam’s dominion was delegated stewardship. Packet 2 now asks how the Satan presents himself after that stewardship is compromised.

The ownership boundary never changes:

“The earth is the LORD’S, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein.”

— Psalm 24:1 (KJV)

Yet the New Testament also uses operative ruler language. Satan is called the god of this world in a passage about blinding, and the prince of the power of the air in a passage about disobedience:

“In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not.”

— 2 Corinthians 4:4 (KJV)

“Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience.”

— Ephesians 2:2 (KJV)

These titles describe operative influence within the fallen world. They do not overturn Psalm 24:1 or Colossians 1:16. The usurper functions inside creation; he does not become its Creator or lawful owner.

The temptation of Jesus displays both intended aspects of the usurpation. Satan presents himself as though the kingdoms are within his power and as though he may assign them to whomever he chooses:

“And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.”

— Luke 4:5–7 (KJV)

The claim carries the two movements of usurpation:

• Appropriation: Satan presents the kingdoms and their glory as a sphere he controls.

• Distribution: he claims the ability to give that authority to whomsoever he will.

• Demand: the opportunity is tied to worship and service under him.

Jesus does not accept the offer or enter a debate over the devil’s deed of title. He answers from the rightful order:

“And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.”

— Luke 4:8 (KJV)

The answer returns worship and service to God. The Satanic offer is exposed as an attempted reassignment of allegiance: receive advancement from the rebel, bow to the rebel, and serve within the rebel’s order.

The study therefore retains both meanings of stolen stewardship. Through deception and yielded obedience, Satan seeks operative control over the vocation entrusted to Adam. He also claims to distribute spheres of rule, glory, opportunity, and influence to fallen powers and human servants.

The exact mechanics are cumulative rather than stated as one formal transfer clause. Romans 6 supplies the service principle: the one to whom a person yields obedience becomes the master served. Luke 4 supplies the rebel’s claim to distribute authority. Ephesians and Corinthians supply operative ruler and blinding language. Psalm 24 preserves God’s ownership.

3.6 No lawful path from rebellion to rightful kingship#

A lawful king does not become king merely because subjects obey him. He requires rightful source, appointment, scope, and accountability. Rebellion supplies none of these.

The Satan is a created being who did not remain in truth. His administration proceeds through deception, blinding, inducement, fear, bondage, and death. His claimed advancement requires worship of the wrong source. His operative authority depends upon creatures leaving their received order.

No amount of successful coercion can transform that history into lawful kingship. Rebellion may acquire power, but not original title. It may acquire servants, but not Creatorhood. It may imitate administration, but not righteous source. It may distribute opportunity, but not faithful inheritance.

This is why the four questions remain separate:

The study is now ready for the central contradiction. The rebel who has no lawful path to kingship does not remain merely a tempter. He becomes an accuser and acts as though the standard he violated can be enforced against everyone beneath him while leaving him untouched.

4. The Double Standard#

The double standard is not merely that Satan sins while accusing sinners. It is more structured. The same rebellion that misrepresents the command, entices desire, seeks worship, and presses death then presents itself as an administrative power over the resulting guilt.

A lawful judge stands under the truth being administered. The accuser in this study does not. He uses truth selectively, presses consequences downward, and behaves as though the standard creates no corresponding liability upward.

Scripture never identifies Satan as the holy Judge. It identifies him as adversary, tempter, deceiver, murderer, and accuser. The contrast between those roles creates the double-standard question.

4.1 The instigator becomes the accuser#

Revelation places deception and accusation beside one another. The old serpent deceives the world, and the same figure accuses the brethren before God:

“And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.”

— Revelation 12:9 (KJV)

“For the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.”

— Revelation 12:10 (KJV)

The canonical identity matters. The accuser does not enter after the deception as a new and independent officer. The deceiver and the accuser are the same adversarial power.

Job shows accusation aimed even at the motive of a righteous servant:

“Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, Doth Job fear God for nought? Hast not thou made an hedge about him, and about his house, and about all that he hath on every side?”

— Job 1:9–10 (KJV)

The accusation is not limited to an observable act. Satan alleges that Job’s fear of God is purchased protection rather than faithfulness. The accuser interprets the servant’s heart through self-interest.

Zechariah presents another accusation scene:

“And he shewed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the LORD, and Satan standing at his right hand to resist him. And the LORD said unto Satan, The LORD rebuke thee, O Satan.”

— Zechariah 3:1–2 (KJV)

Joshua’s filthy garments are real within the vision. The answer is not that there is nothing to address. The answer is that Satan does not control the court. The LORD rebukes the adversary and directs the removal of the iniquity.

This gives the first boundary upon accusation: the accuser may point toward real pollution, question motives, or press a charge, but accusation does not make him the Lawgiver, the final Judge, or the owner of the accused.

4.2 Desire is stirred and then prosecuted#

The process established in Section 3 can now be gathered:

• God speaks: the image bearer receives gift, vocation, warning, and boundary.

• The serpent interprets: the gift is recast as deprivation and the warning as control.

• Desire is enticed: the prohibited object is seen as appetite, beauty, and advancement.

• The image bearer acts: personal desire conceives and sin follows.

• Death gains its field: the warned consequence enters the human story.

• The adversary accuses: the instigator presses guilt, fear, and condemnation.

This process does not mean every accusation is fabricated. Sin creates real guilt. The double standard appears in the accuser’s relationship to the process: he exploits the standard after laboring to produce transgression against it.

Paul’s warning about anger shows how personal responsibility and demonic opportunity can meet without being confused:

“Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath: Neither give place to the devil.”

— Ephesians 4:26–27 (KJV)

The person is commanded not to sin. The devil is described as one who may be given place. The passage does not say the devil forces the anger, nor does it say the anger is spiritually isolated. Unresolved wrath can become an opening exploited by the adversary.

James completes the personal side: each person is drawn away by personal lust. The Satanic side is temptation, deceit, advantage, and accusation. The human side is desire, consent, action, and accountability.

The double standard is therefore not an excuse for the sinner. It is an exposure of the accuser.

4.3 Anger condemned by a murderer#

The force of the double standard becomes especially clear around anger and murder. God’s standard reaches beneath the outward killing into the inward field from which killing grows.

Jesus says:

“Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment: But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment.”

— Matthew 5:21–22 (KJV)

John applies the same inward measurement to hatred:

“Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer.”

— 1 John 3:15 (KJV)

The standard is true. Anger, hatred, and murder cannot be excused simply because the accuser is corrupt. But Jesus also identifies the devil himself as a murderer from the beginning.

This creates the central contradiction: the murderer accuses murder; the liar presses falsehood; the rebel prosecutes disobedience; the one seeking worship condemns misdirected allegiance in those he enticed.

The study must state this carefully. Scripture does not portray Satan as the lawgiver who issued the command of Matthew 5. The double standard is that he uses the guilt exposed by God’s real standard while refusing that standard as the measure of his own standing.

He does not administer the command in order to restore truth, reconcile brothers, or produce life. His described purpose is adversarial and accusatory. He seeks the sentence without submitting to the Lawgiver.

4.4 Guilt below and apparent exemption above#

The double standard appears to place guilt below and exemption above. Human beings enter death. Cain is judged. Adam is driven from the garden. The accused experience shame, fear, bondage, loss, and mortality. Meanwhile the Satan remains active as tempter, ruler, deceiver, and accuser.

That visible asymmetry can make it appear that the governing rebel has created immunity for himself and the fallen powers serving with him.

Scripture, however, does not call this a lawful exemption. It declares the devil’s sin and judgment:

“He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning.”

— 1 John 3:8 (KJV)

“Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.”

— John 16:11 (KJV)

The prince of this world is not waiting for God to discover the case. He is judged. Jesus also speaks of the final punishment prepared for the devil and his angels:

“Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels.”

— Matthew 25:41 (KJV)

The apparent exemption is therefore not acquittal. It is the difference between judgment declared, present activity permitted within bounds, and sentence fully executed at the appointed time.

That distinction is essential. Without it, the study could accidentally strengthen the blinded presumption it intends to expose by portraying Satan as beyond enforcement. Scripture portrays him as active, but not sovereign; dangerous, but not unjudged; accusatory, but not final.

4.5 Present asymmetry is not final exemption#

The present age does not display every sentence at the same speed. This is true in human life and in the spiritual conflict. Delay can be misread as permission, approval, or inability to enforce.

Ecclesiastes describes the human presumption created by delayed sentence:

“Because sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil.”

— Ecclesiastes 8:11 (KJV)

The verse speaks of human hearts, but it reveals the perceptual mechanism: when judgment is not visible and immediate, rebellion interprets delay as safety.

Job also shows that Satan’s activity is bounded. The adversary asks, challenges, and receives a limited permission. God sets the boundary:

“And the LORD said unto Satan, Behold, all that he hath is in thy power; only upon himself put not forth thine hand.”

— Job 1:12 (KJV)

“And the LORD said unto Satan, Behold, he is in thine hand; but save his life.”

— Job 2:6 (KJV)

These passages raise difficult questions about testing and suffering, but they do not present Satan as an independent sovereign. He does not set the ultimate boundary. He operates inside a permission he did not create and cannot lawfully enlarge at will.

Revelation describes him as knowing that his time is short:

“Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.”

— Revelation 12:12 (KJV)

Wrath may intensify when time is short. That intensity can look like strength without limit. The text points in the opposite direction: the adversary’s rage is joined to the knowledge of limitation.

4.6 Fallen principalities and the enforcement question#

The study also asks whether Satan refuses to enforce the law against fallen principalities while directing accusation downward against human participants. Scripture does not present Satan as an impartial judge over fallen powers. It presents a field of shared rebellion, spiritual conflict, differing states, and judgment by God.

Paul describes active hostile powers:

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”

— Ephesians 6:12 (KJV)

Jude and Peter, quoted earlier, describe angels reserved under darkness for judgment. The Gospels also present demons who know that an appointed time of torment exists:

“And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? art thou come hither to torment us before the time?”

— Matthew 8:29 (KJV)

The question “before the time” reveals awareness of an appointed judgment. Fallen powers may be active, ranked, and coordinated in rebellion, but they are not outside God’s final jurisdiction.

The question remains useful: within the counterfeit order, are standards enforced upward against the rulers who encourage the disorder? Scripture gives no picture of Satan purifying his own hierarchy under impartial law. The order is united by rebellion, not by submission to righteousness.

Yet the study must not invent a complete organizational chart. Some fallen angels are described as reserved in chains. Other rulers of darkness are described as active. Demons recognize a future time. Satan accuses. The exact relationships, ranks, jurisdictions, and present restraints require separate audit.

4.7 Accusation unto death#

The phrase accusation unto death gathers the final movement of the packet. Sin truly brings death. The accuser presses that reality toward total captivity, despair, fear, and claimed ownership.

The distinction is not that Satan always invents the underlying guilt. Joshua’s garments in Zechariah are filthy. Human beings have sinned. The distinction concerns standing, purpose, scope, and remedy.

God judges in truth. The accuser presses the charge as adversary. God may rebuke, cleanse, justify, discipline, restore, or finally condemn according to His own righteous authority. Satan seeks the charge as an instrument of domination and death.

This is why the accuser’s order is doubly false:

• False in standing: the murderer is not the holy Judge.

• False in purpose: the charge is used to destroy rather than to restore rightful order.

• False in reciprocity: standards are pressed downward without faithful submission upward.

• False in scope: the accuser treats operative bondage as though it creates ownership.

• False in finality: accusation is presented as though no higher court, rebuke, mercy, or judgment exists.

Revelation’s phrase “accused them before our God day and night” exposes the persistence of the adversarial work. Zechariah exposes its limit: “The LORD rebuke thee, O Satan.” Job exposes its suspicious interpretation of faithful motives. Genesis exposes the deception that preceded the sin.

The full sequence is now visible:

Packet 2 Closing — The Accuser Is Not the Lawgiver#

Packet 2 began before human participation. All visible and invisible powers are created. Some angels sinned and left their assigned estate. By Genesis 3, the serpent is already deceiving. Jesus identifies the devil as one who did not remain in truth, a liar, and a murderer from the beginning.

The lie enters the human field by misrepresenting the Giver. Abundance is made to look like deprivation. Warning is made to look like control. Seizure is presented as wisdom. The image bearer sees, desires, consents, and takes. James preserves the responsibility of the person drawn by personal lust. The adversary’s influence does not erase the participant’s accountability.

The Satan then presents himself as ruler, distributor, and accuser. He claims spheres of authority and offers them in exchange for worship. He presses the guilt and death that follow the rebellion. Yet his operative power never becomes lawful title. The earth remains the LORD’s. The created powers remain created. Worship and service belong to God.

The double standard is therefore exact. The liar uses truth as a weapon. The murderer presses the guilt of anger, hatred, and death. The rebel demands obedience. The instigator prosecutes the disorder he helped cultivate. Standards are directed downward while the governing rebel behaves as though they create no liability upward.

Scripture does not confirm that presumed exemption. The prince of this world is judged. Fallen angels are reserved unto judgment. Demons recognize an appointed time. Satan’s work in Job is bounded. Revelation says he knows his time is short. Delay is not acquittal, and present activity is not sovereign immunity.

The next packet will therefore examine the administrative appearance built around this double standard. How does rebellion borrow the forms of order—hierarchy, reward, punishment, protection, exemption, and enforcement—without possessing a lawful foundation? How can a system founded on disobedience demand obedience from everyone beneath it?

➜ Created creature → rebel → deceiver → tempter → instigator → accuser → judged and limited adversary